CNN On New York Marriage

This aired last night and includes an interview with Freedom To Marry's Evan Wolfson as well as some coverage of Obama's fundraiser speech in NYC.

Freedom To Marry's Evan Wolfson: I'm Very Hopeful On New York Marriage

This aired last night on CNN.

HomoQuotable - Evan Wolfson

"Focus on the Family finally got something right—the American people are rejecting their anti-gay toxic rhetoric and punitive politics, and are siding with loving and committed couples seeking the freedom to marry. With six national polls now confirming that a majority of Americans support the freedom to marry, it’s time for Focus on the Family and other anti-gay industry activists to move on and, ideally, redirect their resources toward tackling the real problems gay and non-gay Americans could be confronting together in these tough economic times." - Freedom To Marry head Evan Wolfson, responding to Focus president Jim Daly, who says the Christian right has lost the marriage battle.

Nadler Intro's House DOMA Repeal Bill

With Freedom To Marry's Evan Wolfson looking on.

Celebs Pressure Obama On Marriage

A coalition of openly gay celebrities and their allies have issued a public letter to the president, asking that he complete his "evolution" and come out publicly in support of same-sex marriage. The letter reads, in part:

Like so many Americans, you have spoken of your personal journey toward support for the freedom to marry. You have talked about the gay and lesbian people in your life, their commitment to each other and care for their kids, and their families that aren’t so different from any other family.

We ask you now for your leadership on ending the exclusion of same-sex couples from marriage, an exclusion that harms millions of Americans each day. Whether to end discrimination in marriage is a question America has faced before, and faces again today. With so many Americans talking it through in heartfelt conversations, it is a question that calls for clarity from the President.

Among those signing the letter: Ellen DeGeneres, Anne Hathaway, David Geffen, Martin Sheen, Eric McCormack, Lily Tomlin, Scott Fujita, and Julian Bond.

Peter Sprigg Vs. Evan Wolfson On DOMA

Even though the Family Research Council's Peter Sprigg famously called for the expulsion of all gay people from the United States, this hate group spokesdouche still gets invited onto national television. Today he sparred with Freedom To Marry's Evan Wolfson over the GOP's plan to defend DOMA. Hilariously, Sprigg claims that the main opposition to same-sex marriage isn't based on religion.

Freedom To Marry's Evan Wolfson Wins Economist Debate With Maggie Gallagher

Freedom To Marry's Evan Wolfson has been named the winner of the weeklong online marriage equality debate with Maggie Gallagher at the Economist.

The votes are in and though the tally has fluctuated throughout the week, a steady majority of you are convinced that gay marriage should be legal. Congratulations to Evan Wolfson, who passionately defended the motion. He is your winner. Commiserations to Maggie Gallagher, whose losing argument still resonates with many Americans. In the end, our audience was not convinced that gay marriage would have a deleterious effect on society or heterosexual unions. Quite the opposite, in fact. Many of you noted the benefits marriage would bestow on gay couples and their families, while agreeing with Mr Wolfson's argument that "there is no good reason" for their exclusion. Marriage is as applicable to devoted gay couples as it is to their heterosexual counterparts, you concluded, and it is their right.

Congratulations to Mr. Wolfson!

Evan Wolfson Vs. Maggie Gallagher

All this week the Economist is hosting a rather unusual online debate between Freedom To Marry's Evan Wolfson and NOM's Maggie Gallagher. Click over and join in.

(Tipped by JMG reader Mark)

Freedom To Marry's Evan Wolfson Has Some Good News And A Survey

Here's the survey, please take part.

Freedom To Marry Responds

Freedom To Marry's Evan Wolfson responds:

"Today's 9th Circuit order expediting appeal of Chief Judge Walker's persuasive decision striking down Prop 8 and maintaining a stay during the appellate review, is a disappointing delay for many Californians who hoped to celebrate the freedom to marry and full inclusion in society as soon as possible. But there are many twists in the road to justice, and we are encouraged by the court's setting a fast pace for the appeal, revealing that the judges understand how important a quick end to the exclusion from marriage is to gay couples, their loved ones, and all Americans who believe in equality under the law. While the lawyers make the case for the freedom to marry in the courts of law, we have more months in which to make our case in the court of public opinion. The evidence at trial overwhelmingly confirmed that there is no good reason for withholding the freedom to marry from committed couples, and the Governor, the Attorney General, a majority of Californians, and a majority of Americans agree with Judge Walker that the freedom to marry helps families, while hurting no one. Prop 8 should never have been on the ballot and we look forward to seeing its stain removed from the law books, as we push forward on other fronts across the country."

Guest Post - Evan Wolfson

Evan Wolfson is the founder and executive director of Freedom To Marry.

What's Next In The Battle Against Prop 8?

Thursday kicked off another emotional rollercoaster for many California couples as U.S. District Court Chief Judge Vaughn R. Walker rejected a permanent stay of hisAugust 4th ruling striking down Prop 8, but allowed a grace-period for the Ninth Circuit appellate court to decide whether to grant its own stay or let marriages resume on August 18th. Both sides of this issue have filed their motions in response to Judge Walker’s ruling, and now the Ninth Circuit seems poised to rule on the stay before August 18th, perhaps as early as today.

If the Ninth Circuit denies the request for a stay, the anti-gay Prop 8 forces could then ask the United States Supreme Court to issue one. Such a request would be directed to Justice Anthony Kennedy, who could either rule himself or submit it to the full Supreme Court. There are several other permutations possible, including the Ninth Circuit issuing a stay while it considers the appeal, or quick denials all around leading to marriages resuming soon. We’ll have to see how it unfolds; hence, the nerve-wracking suspense and high emotions.

Meanwhile, though, there was a lot to celebrate in Judge Walker’s ruling.

Much like his initial decision declaring Proposition 8 a violation of the Constitution’s guarantees of equal protection and due process (the freedom to marry), Judge Walker’s ruling was thorough, solid, and smart. He noted that, once again, the Prop 8 proponents failed to show any evidence, or provide any clear explanation, of how they are harmed if same-sex couples share in marriage. Judge Walker noted, in fact, the state of California itself has said it doesn’t wish to appeal and doesn’t even want a stay. As Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and Attorney General Jerry Brown put it, California has no interest in discriminating and marriage for same-sex couples “is consistent with California’s long history of treating all people and their relationships with equal dignity and respect.” The Prop 8 proponents, who intervened to defend the law in Judge Walker’s courtroom, may not even have standing to bring an appeal, given that they are private citizens who have nothing to do with the administration of marriage and, as Judge Walker remarked in my favorite line, have not “alleged that any of them seek to wed a same-sex spouse.” Since they may not even have standing to drag out the case, the Ninth Circuit may conclude there is no appeal.

While emotions are high and the twists in the road are wrenching, we must not spend our time obsessing over the things we can’t control and should focus instead on what we can. Specifically, we can control whether we use every powerful argument and evidence assembled by Judge Walker to make the same powerful case for the freedom to marry in the court of public opinion that we are making in the courts of law. Courts don’t operate in a vacuum; creating a climate and momentum is as important to winning a court case as writing excellent briefs, and it is something we can all contribute to right now.

We don’t yet know how Prop 8 will ultimately fall – whether through this court case or by going back on the ballot as soon as 2012. The work we do now to solidify a majority in California by breaking our silence and asking the non-gay people in our life for support will maximize our chances of winning either way.

For the rest of us throughout the country, last week we racked up our first-ever nationwide poll showing that a majority of Americans now favor the freedom to marry and that the opponents of liberty and equal protection for gay people are in the minority. If we can persuade Bill Clinton, Laura Bush, and even the likes of Glenn Beck to make the journey from opposition to support, then we surely keep barreling down all three tracks of Freedom to Marry’s Roadmap to Victory, which calls for winning more states, securing a majority for marriage, and ending federal marriage discrimination. Whether we win back California next week, or have to keep working at it with one eye on the courts, one eye on the ballot, and both eyes on the prize, the momentum spurred by Judge Walker’s powerful ruling is ours to use in the nationwide persuasion needed now. Let’s use it.

-Evan Wolfson

Evan Wolfson Vs. Tony Perkins

CNN's Rick Sanchez gets all up in Tony Perkins' grill. Not a fan of Sanchez usually, but this is good.

Evan Wolfson Vs. Maggie Gallagher

Maggie gets pissed when most of the airtime goes to Freedom To Marry's Evan Wolfson. Bwah bwah bwahhhhhh.

HomoQuotable - Evan Wolfson

"Freedom to Marry calls on NOM to repudiate the anti-gay prejudice that underlies its political agenda and fuels its attack campaigns. NOM's "Summer for Marriage" anti-gay bus tour has devolved from a media gimmick to a display of prejudice and incitement to violence. While funneling millions of dollars into political campaigns aimed at stripping away basic protections from gay people and their families, NOM's typical ploy is to conjure up phony claims of harassment and infringement and complain when anyone speaks the truth about its record and agenda.

"But with today's display, the mask slipped, revealing what lies beneath NOM's diversions, protestations, and veneer. The real victims of NOM are committed, loving gay couples across the country who are denied the freedom to marry and the critical safety net that marriage brings. And all Americans are harmed by the divisiveness, prejudice, and violence that NOM's actions invite." - Freedom To Marry executive director Evan Wolfson, responding to the "solution to gay marriage" sign brandished at NOM's rally in Indianapolis yesterday.